The floatation is phenomenal for a ski this width and this fact has been noted on some other review sites as well. My biggest takeaway with this ski is that I really don’t need the QST-118. Also as a bonus, the new graphics are very classy and subdued compared to the Qs.įirst the QST-106. But not too much! Unlike a full metal layered ski, they still totally retain their light and playful character. ![]() The addition of the carbon/flax layer and titanium power plate underfoot, really helped to address a Q Series weakness, which was lack of power and stability. It looks like these latest design tweaks adding carbon/flax and just a little metal were meant to address this issue and move them a bit more to the right.Ĭlick here for the entire Salomon 2016/17 product lineupĪfter using the QST-92, 99, and 106 for a full season, let me share some observations. If there was one knock on the Q Series, it was that on the spectrum between quickness/playfulness on the left, and power/stabilityon the right, they were a bit too far left for some expert skiers. The QST-118 will now have four lengths available The QST-106 will have a tighter turn radius at 20mĦ. (turning radius will vary between lengths)ĥ. All models have the same waist width throughout all lengths and it is the “titled” width. ![]() All models will have a Ti metal power platform underfootĤ. All models will have a beefed up carbon/flax coreģ. ![]() All models will be slightly wider with the QST-92, 99, 106, and 118Ģ. Exciting new changes for the Q Series lineupįor 2016/17 it will be renamed the QST Series and some key changes have garnered glowing early reviews.ġ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |