With the relationship seemingly unable to be rescued, the Danish Business Authority intervened, as is protocol, and Patti agreed to sell his share, taking €7.2 million (50m DKK) for his 49% of the company. Jensen's lawyers argued that this wasn't the case, and formally supported the position that Jensen had only resigned as creative director, not as an executive. Acting on that, he removed Jensen from the company CVR register, which records various aspects of a company's personnel and financial information for the Danish government. Jensen claims this letter referred only to his position as creative director, with his intention being that he remain an executive of Playdead, but Patti says that distinction wasn't clear from the letter and he believed that the resignation was total. Primarily, it's a debate about exactly what job Jensen was resigning from. However, he did confirm that the conflict lead to Jensen submitting a letter of resignation, and that the nature of that letter is what lead to the irreconcilable differences resulting in Patti's departure. ![]() ![]() Speaking to, he said that the reasons remain private. What exactly caused the initial breakdown in communication between the two friends remains unclear, and neither party is wiling to make those details public at this time, but Patti has stated that any press speculation on arguments about IP ownership and release schedules is unfounded. Some of the details behind the acrimonious split between Playdead's management, which resulted in the departure of co-founder Dino Patti from the company, have emerged after a Danish newspaper reported on a rift which had developed between him and creative director Arnt Jensen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |